Geoffrey Stone of the University of Chicago Law School has an op-ed piece in this morning's New York Times [it's an abbreviated version of a post he wrote for the Law School's Faculty Blog], in which he argues for the creation of a new executive branch position: a civil liberties adviser, or even a Council of Civil Liberties Advisers analogous to the Council of Economic Advisers.
Within the
highest councils of every administration there should be a respected
public official whose charge it is to defend our civil liberties
against all comers.
Presidents have been partial to the creation of such positions or offices in times of crisis or emergency -- or when the president has otherwise felt it necessary to signal to the public that he assigns great priority to some problem. For example, President Nixon appointed former Colorado Governor John Love to be his "energy czar" during the first gas crisis in 1973. Presidents Ford and Carter also appointed "energy czars." President George H.W. Bush appointed Bill Bennett to be his "Drug Czar," a job later held under President Clinton by former general Barry McCaffrey. And Clinton appointed an "AIDS czar." Similarly, to demonstrate his commitment to dealing with the economy that his predecessors had trashed, Clinton created a National Economic Council composed of cabinet members and key White House Staffers. So, there's plenty of precedent for the creation of such a post or panel, even though it's a practice that gets some critics quite exercised.
In any case, if the typical rationale for creating such a position is to respond to a crisis or emergency, then Stone is correct and justified in calling for a civil-liberties adviser inside the White House — someone whose explicit job is to look out for and advocate for the protection of civil liberties when decisions are being made. After all, under Bush & Cheney, the failure to do this has brought us to a civil-liberties crisis.